z-logo
Premium
Systematic evaluation of single mismatch stability predictors for fluorescence in situ hybridization
Author(s) -
Yilmaz L. Safak,
Bergsven Lindsey I.,
Noguera Daniel R.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
environmental microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.954
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1462-2920
pISSN - 1462-2912
DOI - 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01719.x
Subject(s) - biology , fluorescence in situ hybridization , in situ , stability (learning theory) , computational biology , biological system , estimator , hybridization probe , genetics , computer science , statistics , mathematics , dna , machine learning , physics , gene , meteorology , chromosome
Summary The mismatch discrimination potential of probes in fluorescence in situ hybridization can be defined as the difference between the melting formamide points of perfect complementary and mismatched duplexes (Δ[FA] m ). Using a combined experimental and theoretical approach, Δ[FA] m was determined for a set of 35 mismatched probes targeting seven locations in the 16S rRNA of Escherichia coli . The mismatches were created by changing single nucleotides on the probes, while maintaining the target unmodified. Estimated Δ[FA] m values were used to systematically evaluate four predictors of mismatch stability: weighted mismatch (WM) scores from the software arb , published statistical summary of microarray hybridizations, free energy of mismatch stability (ΔΔ G ° 1 ) and theoretical Δ[FA] m estimations obtained with a thermodynamic model. Based on the predictors' ability to explain variability in Δ[FA] m and to discriminate weak mismatches from strong ones, ΔΔ G ° 1 and WM scores from arb (with an updated set of relative strength parameters) were demonstrated to be adequate estimators of mismatch stability, with ΔΔ G ° 1 offering the benefit of capturing the variability associated with nearest‐neighbour effects and being compatible with thermodynamic models of in situ hybridization. The use of ΔΔ G ° 1 and WM in probe design was illustrated as a tool that complements experimental design approaches.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here