Premium
Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri‐environment schemes in five European countries
Author(s) -
Kleijn D.,
Baquero R. A.,
Clough Y.,
Díaz M.,
Esteban J.,
Fernández F.,
Gabriel D.,
Herzog F.,
Holzschuh A.,
Jöhl R.,
Knop E.,
Kruess A.,
Marshall E. J. P.,
SteffanDewenter I.,
Tscharntke T.,
Verhulst J.,
West T. M.,
Yela J. L.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
ecology letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.852
H-Index - 265
eISSN - 1461-0248
pISSN - 1461-023X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00869.x
Subject(s) - biodiversity , endangered species , abundance (ecology) , ecology , geography , agriculture , agricultural biodiversity , environmental resource management , agroforestry , biology , habitat , environmental science
Agri‐environment schemes are an increasingly important tool for the maintenance and restoration of farmland biodiversity in Europe but their ecological effects are poorly known. Scheme design is partly based on non‐ecological considerations and poses important restrictions on evaluation studies. We describe a robust approach to evaluate agri‐environment schemes and use it to evaluate the biodiversity effects of agri‐environment schemes in five European countries. We compared species density of vascular plants, birds, bees, grasshoppers and crickets, and spiders on 202 paired fields, one with an agri‐environment scheme, the other conventionally managed. In all countries, agri‐environment schemes had marginal to moderately positive effects on biodiversity. However, uncommon species benefited in only two of five countries and species listed in Red Data Books rarely benefited from agri‐environment schemes. Scheme objectives may need to differentiate between biodiversity of common species that can be enhanced with relatively simple modifications in farming practices and diversity or abundance of endangered species which require more elaborate conservation measures.