Premium
The pattern of intravenous drug administration during the transfer of critically ill children by a specialist transport team
Author(s) -
SAHA AGNI S.,
LANGRIDGE PAUL,
PLAYFOR STEPHEN D.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
pediatric anesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.704
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1460-9592
pISSN - 1155-5645
DOI - 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.01912.x
Subject(s) - medicine , critically ill , midazolam , medical prescription , drug , pharmacy , intravenous infusions , bolus (digestion) , route of administration , emergency medicine , intensive care medicine , anesthesia , pharmacology , nursing , sedation
Summary Background: There are few published data on the patterns of intravenous drug administration by specialist pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) transport teams during the transfer of critically ill children between hospitals. Methods: A retrospective review of retrieval documentation was undertaken for all patients transported by the Royal Manchester Children's Hospital PICU transport team over a period of 1 year. Results: A total of 257 patients were transported during the study period, 82 patients (32%) were excluded owing to incomplete or absent documentation, leaving a sample of 175 available for analysis. Intravenous drugs were administered to 168 of these patients (96%). In total, 38 different drugs were administered. The four most commonly administered drugs were midazolam (130 patients), morphine (129 patients), atracurium (108 patients), and heparin (53 patients). Ten drugs accounted for 90% of all prescription episodes (total number of infusions and bolus doses administered), whilst 16 drugs were prescribed only once. The mean number of drugs administered per patient was 3.25 with a mean of 1.96 drug infusions and 1.29 bolus drugs administered per patient. Conclusions: A relatively small number of drugs are used frequently during the retrieval of critically ill children, but the total range of drugs that are used is large. This has implications for the rational carriage of drugs by PICU transport teams, the potential for drug errors and also for the development of advanced nurse practitioners whose prescribing‐like activities may depend on the development of Patient Group Directions.