Premium
The differential modulation of the ventral premotor–motor interaction during movement initiation is deficient in patients with focal hand dystonia
Author(s) -
Houdayer Elise,
Beck Sandra,
Karabanov Anke,
Poston Brach,
Hallett Mark
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
european journal of neuroscience
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.346
H-Index - 206
eISSN - 1460-9568
pISSN - 0953-816X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07960.x
Subject(s) - neuroscience , premotor cortex , transcranial magnetic stimulation , motor cortex , primary motor cortex , stimulation , dystonia , inhibitory postsynaptic potential , psychology , silent period , medicine , dorsum , anatomy
A major feature of focal hand dystonia (FHD) pathophysiology is the loss of inhibition. One inhibitory process, surround inhibition, for which the cortical mechanisms are still unknown, is abnormal in FHD. As the ventral premotor cortex (PMv) plays a key role in the sensorimotor processing involved in shaping finger movements and has many projections onto the primary motor cortex (M1), we hypothesized that the PMv–M1 connections might play a role in surround inhibition. A paired‐pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation paradigm was used in order to evaluate and compare the PMv–M1 interactions during different phases (rest, preparation and execution) of an index finger movement in patients with FHD and controls. A sub‐threshold conditioning pulse (80% resting motor threshold) was applied to the PMv at 6 ms before M1 stimulation. The right abductor pollicis brevis, a surround muscle, was the target muscle. In healthy controls, the results showed that PMv stimulation induced an ipsilateral ventral premotor–motor inhibition at rest. This cortico‐cortical interaction changed into an early facilitation (100 ms before movement onset) and turned back to inhibition 50 ms later. In patients with FHD, this PMv–M1 interaction and its modulation were absent. Our results show that, although the ipsilateral ventral premotor–motor inhibition does not play a key role in the genesis of surround inhibition, PMv has a dynamic influence on M1 excitability during the early steps of motor execution. The impaired cortico‐cortical interactions observed in patients with FHD might contribute, at least in part, to the abnormal motor command.