z-logo
Premium
Driving forces for localized corrosion‐to‐fatigue crack transition in Al–Zn–Mg–Cu
Author(s) -
BURNS J. T.,
LARSEN J. M.,
GANGLOFF R. P.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
fatigue and fracture of engineering materials and structures
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.887
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1460-2695
pISSN - 8756-758X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2011.01568.x
Subject(s) - materials science , crack closure , microstructure , stress concentration , corrosion fatigue , structural engineering , finite element method , corrosion , stress (linguistics) , composite material , fracture mechanics , metallurgy , engineering , linguistics , philosophy
Research on fatigue crack formation from a corroded 7075‐T651 surface provides insight into the governing mechanical driving forces at microstructure‐scale lengths that are intermediate between safe life and damage tolerant feature sizes. Crack surface marker‐bands accurately quantify cycles ( N i ) to form a 10–20 μm fatigue crack emanating from both an isolated pit perimeter and EXCO corroded surface. The  N i  decreases with increasing‐applied stress. Fatigue crack formation involves a complex interaction of elastic stress concentration due to three‐dimensional pit macro‐topography coupled with local micro‐topographic plastic strain concentration, further enhanced by microstructure (particularly sub‐surface constituents). These driving force interactions lead to high variability in cycles to form a fatigue crack, but from an engineering perspective, a broadly corroded surface should contain an extreme group of features that are likely to drive the portion of life to form a crack to near 0. At low‐applied stresses, crack formation can constitute a significant portion of life, which is predicted by coupling macro‐pit and micro‐feature elastic–plastic stress/strain concentrations from finite element analysis with empirical low‐cycle fatigue life models. The presented experimental results provide a foundation to validate next‐generation crack formation models and prognosis methods.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here