Premium
Residual strength of unidirectional fibre‐metal laminates based on J C toughness of C(T) and SE(B) specimens: comparison with M(T) test results
Author(s) -
CASTRODEZA E. M.,
BASTIAN F. L.,
IPIÑA J. E. PEREZ
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
fatigue and fracture of engineering materials and structures
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.887
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1460-2695
pISSN - 8756-758X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00803.x
Subject(s) - materials science , residual strength , fracture toughness , composite material , residual stress , toughness , plasticity , residual , tension (geology) , fracture mechanics , enhanced data rates for gsm evolution , compact tension specimen , ultimate tensile strength , crack growth resistance curve , crack closure , mathematics , telecommunications , algorithm , computer science
Fibre‐metal laminates (FMLs) are structural composites designed with the aim of producing very low fatigue crack‐propagation rate, damage‐tolerant and high‐strength materials, if compared to aeronautical Al alloys. Their application in aeronautical structures demands a deep knowledge of a wide set of mechanical properties and technological values, including both fracture toughness and residual strength. The residual strength of FMLs have been traditionally determined by using wide centre‐cracked tension panels M(T). The use of this geometry requires large quantities of material and heavy laboratory facilities. In this work, fracture toughness ( J C ) of some unidirectional FMLs laminates was measured using a recently proposed methodology for critical fracture toughness evaluation on compact tension C(T) and single‐edge bend SE(B) specimens. Additionally, residual strength values of wider M(T) specimens with different widths ( W from 150 to 200 mm) and several crack to width ratios (2 a/W ) were experimentally obtained. Some experimental residual strength values of M(T) specimens ( W from 150 to 400 mm and different 2 a/W ratios) of Arall were also obtained from the bibliography. Based on J C results from C(T) and SE(B) specimens, and either using or not using crack‐tip plasticity corrections, the residual strengths of the M(T) specimens were predicted and compared to the experimental ones. The results showed good agreement, especially when crack‐tip plasticity corrections were applied.