z-logo
Premium
A STUDY OF FATIGUE AND CREEP BEHAVIOUR OF FOUR HIGH TEMPERATURE SOLDERS
Author(s) -
Liang J.,
Gollhardt N.,
Lee P. S.,
Schroeder S. A.,
Morris W. L.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
fatigue and fracture of engineering materials and structures
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.887
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1460-2695
pISSN - 8756-758X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1996.tb00175.x
Subject(s) - eutectic system , materials science , creep , alloy , metallurgy , strain (injury) , deformation (meteorology) , stress (linguistics) , soldering , cyclic stress , composite material , medicine , linguistics , philosophy
Creep and cyclic deformation behavior of two lead‐free high temperature solder alloys, 95Sn‐5Ag and 99Sn‐1.0Cu, a high lead alloy 97.SPb‐1.SAg‐1.0Sn, and an Ag‐modified eutectic alloy 62.SSn‐36.1Pb‐1.4Ag, were studied. Room temperature and high (100°C and 150°C) temperature fatigue tests (with cyclic strain amplitude up to 6.0%) for the four solders were conducted, with the fatigue lives ranging from a few cycles to more than 100,000 cycles. It is shown that among the alloys studied, 62.SSn‐36.1Pb‐1.4Ag (the modified Sn‐Pb eutectic alloy) has the lowest fatigue resistance in term of low cycle fatigue life (strain controlled). The high lead alloy, 97.SPb‐1.5Ag‐1.0Sn, has the highest strain fatigue resistance in the large strain region (Δ > 2.0%). Temperature has a significant effect on alloys 95Sn‐5Ag and 99Sn‐1.0Cu, but has a negligible effect on the Ag modified Sn‐Pb eutectic alloy 62.5Sn‐36.1Pb‐1.4Ag and 97.5Pb‐1.5Ag‐1.0Sn. Creep studies show that these alloys generally have a very significant primary creep regime (up to 20%); thus, any realistic constitutive relation has to take such a primary creep phase into consideration. Cyclic deformation of alloy 95Sn‐SAg was simulated by using a constitutive relation built upon a 2‐cell model, which covers both primary and secondary creep. This model provides a good estimate of the peak stresses (the minimum stress and the maximum stress in each cycle); it agrees with experimental results when the applied cyclic strain is small and/or the applied strain rate is very low.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here