Premium
A NUMERICAL STUDY ON GLOBAL AND LOCAL PARAMETERS CONTROLLING FRACTURE IN THE BRITTLE‐DUCTILE TRANSITION TEMPERATURE REGION
Author(s) -
Dedovic S.,
Bakker A.,
Latzko D. G. H.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
fatigue and fracture of engineering materials and structures
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.887
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1460-2695
pISSN - 8756-758X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01179.x
Subject(s) - materials science , fracture (geology) , von mises yield criterion , constraint (computer aided design) , brittleness , stress (linguistics) , hydrostatic stress , structural engineering , deformation (meteorology) , plane stress , brittle fracture , stress intensity factor , mechanics , composite material , fracture mechanics , geometry , mathematics , physics , engineering , finite element method , linguistics , philosophy
— In this report on fracture studies pertinent to the brittle‐ductile transition region the predictive capability of a local fracture parameter, i.e. maximum tensile stress normal to the crack plane (= maximum principal stress), and of a global fracture parameter, i.e. the J ‐integral, are compared for SENB and CNT specimens fractured at −70°C. The influence of constraint is also investigated, both locally as defined by the ratios of mean (hydrostatic) stress and maximum principal stress to von Mises stress, and globally as defined by the factor m = J /(s̀ γ .CTOD). Results obtained indicate that stress fields in a varying constraint environment (i.e. varying both spatially and with extent of plastic deformation) are not uniquely characterized by J and require additional information on the amount of constraint. Fracture predictions based on maximum principal stress ahead of the crack tip exhibit far less scatter than those based on J , but further investigations are required on the geometry (in)dependence of this local parameter.