Premium
Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway involved in progestin‐resistance of human endometrial carcinoma: In a mouse model
Author(s) -
Xu Yanli,
Tong Jianqian,
Ai Zhihong,
Wang Juan,
Teng Yincheng
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.597
H-Index - 50
eISSN - 1447-0756
pISSN - 1341-8076
DOI - 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.01881.x
Subject(s) - gefitinib , epidermal growth factor receptor , cancer research , medicine , progestin , autophosphorylation , endometrial cancer , epidermal growth factor , endocrinology , receptor , cancer , biology , kinase , microbiology and biotechnology , hormone , protein kinase a
Aim: The aim of these investigations was to study the role of gefitinib (a specific oral epidermal growth factor receptor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor) on reversing progestin‐resistance in a human endometrial carcinoma xenograft model. Material and Methods: To study the effect of gefitinib and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression on tumor progestin resistance, the Ishikawa endometrial carcinoma cell line was transfected to stably express a high level of EGFR, which resulted in the progestin‐resistant Ishikawa‐pLWERNL subcell line. BALB/c nude mice were injected subcutaneously with the parental Ishikawa cell line and the Ishikawa‐pLWERNL cell line. Therapy experiments with gefitinib alone or in combination with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) were done and samples were analyzed for EGFR and progesterone receptor isoform B (PR‐B) expression by Western blot and immumohistochemistry analyses. Role in blocking EGFR autophosphorylation and its downstream signaling pathway and antagonizing progestin resistance by gefitinib was investigated by Western blot analysis. Results: EGFR expression was higher in progestin‐resistant Ishikawa‐pLWERNL endometrial cancer (EC) xenografts than in progestin‐sensitive Ishikawa EC xenografts; in contrast, PR‐B was higher in Ishikawa xenografts than in Ishikawa‐pLWERNL xenografts. Higher EGFR expression reduced sensitivity to progestin and decreased PR‐B expression in Ishikawa xenografts; it also abnormally activated EGFR autophosphorylation and its downstream signaling pathway. Gefitinib effectively inhibited the proliferation of EC xenografts that overexpressed EGFR, and reversed hormone resistance in progestin‐resistant EC xenografts. Discussion: The present study describes an in vivo model that can provide a valuable tool in studying the interaction of overexpressed EGFR and progestin resistance in EC. Gefitinib may be useful in the treatment of progestin‐resistant EC.