Premium
Efficacy, safety and hospital costs of tension‐free vaginal tape and pubovaginal sling in the surgical treatment of stress incontinence
Author(s) -
Kondo Atsuo,
Isobe Yasuaki,
Kimura Kyousuke,
Kamihira Osamu,
Matsuura Osamu,
Gotoh Momokazu,
Ozawa Hideo
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.597
H-Index - 50
eISSN - 1447-0756
pISSN - 1341-8076
DOI - 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2006.00469.x
Subject(s) - medicine , sling (weapon) , urinary incontinence , surgery , cure rate , significant difference
Aim: The efficacy, safety and hospital costs of the tension‐free vaginal tape procedure were compared with the pubovaginal sling operation. Methods: A total of 60 women urodynamically diagnosed as having stress or mixed urinary incontinence were operated on using either the tension‐free vaginal tape or pubovaginal sling operation in a prospective manner. Preoperative characteristics of the women were not significantly different for the groups. The women were followed for up to 24 months. Results: In the tension‐free vaginal tape group, the operation time was shorter, numbers of analgesics postoperatively required were less and hospital charges were less expensive compared to those in the pubovaginal sling operation ( P < 0.01). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed a marginal significant difference ( P = 0.059) in the objective cumulative cure rates at 24 months between the groups receiving the former (70.3%) and latter (48.3%) procedures. Subjective cure rates were not significantly different ( P = 0.101). In both groups, an improvement in quality of life was significant and surgical complications were identical. De novo urge incontinence developed in 6% and 10% in the former and latter, respectively. Conclusions: The tension‐free tape was significantly superior to the pubovaginal sling in terms of operation time, postoperative pain, and hospital charges, but not in cure rates. A longer follow up with a larger sample size is necessary to draw definite conclusions.