z-logo
Premium
Director perceptions of end‐of‐life care at geriatric health services facilities in Japan
Author(s) -
Hirakawa Yoshihisa,
Masuda Yuichiro,
Kuzuya Masafumi,
Iguchi Akihisa,
Uemura Kazumasa
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
geriatrics and gerontology international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.823
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1447-0594
pISSN - 1444-1586
DOI - 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2007.00392.x
Subject(s) - end of life care , medicine , nursing , health care , intervention (counseling) , duration (music) , perception , long term care , family medicine , gerontology , palliative care , psychology , economic growth , art , literature , neuroscience , economics
Geriatric health services facilities (GHSF) are expected to assume a greater role in caring for the dying elderly in the future. However, very little research has dealt with the topic. The aim of this nationwide study is to clarify current end‐of‐life care policies and practices of GHSF. The subjects were 2876 managing directors of GHSF. Data was collected through mailed questionnaires in 2003. The content of the questionnaires included: (i) general characteristics; (ii) end‐of‐life care policies; (iii) available medical treatments; and (iv) staff education. To evaluate the factors associated with end‐of‐life care policies at GHSF, we divided the facilities into two groups, according to whether their policy toward end‐of‐life care was progressive or regressive. The response rate was 40.3%. The results indicated that a total of 513 GHSF implemented progressive policies for end‐of‐life care. The factors associated with a progressive policy for end‐of‐life care were: (i) availability of medical intervention within and outside of the facilities; (ii) staff education; and (iii) discussion about end‐of‐life care policy with residents and family. Duration of stay also was positively associated with a progressive policy. Our study highlights the need for a national consensus on reforming the end‐of‐life care system of long‐term care facilities.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here