Premium
Impacts of tillage and application methods on atrazine and alachlor losses from upland fields
Author(s) -
WATANABE HIROZUMI,
WATERMEIER NATHAN L.,
STEICHEN JAMES M.,
BARNES PHILLIP,
PHONG THAI K.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
weed biology and management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.351
H-Index - 36
eISSN - 1445-6664
pISSN - 1444-6162
DOI - 10.1111/j.1445-6664.2006.00238.x
Subject(s) - alachlor , tillage , plough , loam , atrazine , agronomy , soil loss , environmental science , biology , soil science , surface runoff , pesticide , soil water , ecology
The effects of tillage practises and the methods of chemical application on atrazine and alachlor losses through run‐off were evaluated for five treatments: conservation (untilled) and surface (US), disk and surface, plow and surface, disk and preplant‐incorporated, and plow and preplant‐incorporated treatments. A rainfall simulator was used to create 63.5 mm h −1 of rainfall for 60 min and 127 mm h −1 for 15 min. Rainfall simulation occurred 24–36 h after chemical application. There was no significant difference in the run‐off volume among the treatments but the untilled treatment significantly reduced erosion loss. The untilled treatments had the highest herbicide concentration and the disk treatments were higher than the plow treatments. The surface treatments showed a higher concentration than the incorporated treatments. The concentration of herbicides in the water decreased with time. Among the experimental sites, the one with sandy loam soil produced the greatest losses, both in terms of the run‐off volume and herbicide loss. The US treatments had the highest loss and the herbicide incorporation treatments had smaller losses through run‐off as the residue cover was effective in preventing herbicide losses. Incorporation might be a favorable method of herbicide application to reduce the herbicide losses by run‐off.