Premium
Weed infestation and tea growth under various weed management methods in a young tea ( Camellia sinensis [L.] Kuntze) plantation
Author(s) -
PREMATILAKE KAPILA G.,
FROUDWILLIAMS ROBERT J.,
EKANAYAKE PUNCHI B.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
weed biology and management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.351
H-Index - 36
eISSN - 1445-6664
pISSN - 1444-6162
DOI - 10.1111/j.1445-6664.2004.00144.x
Subject(s) - weed control , weed , camellia sinensis , mulch , biology , agronomy , dry weight , horticulture
A field experiment was conducted in the low country of Sri Lanka, during the period 1994–1995 to investigate the severity of weed infestation and tea growth in relation to weed management methods in newly established tea ( Camellia sinensis [L.] Kuntze). Manual weeding (hand and slash weeding) at various intervals was compared with various herbicides, with or without mulching. Weed control with herbicides was superior to that of hand weeding at 6‐week intervals or more. Weed control with oxyfluorfen at 0.29 kg ai ha −1 + paraquat at 0.17 kg ai ha −1 or glyphosate at 0.99 kg ai ha −1 + kaolin at 3.42 kg ha −1 were superior. Plots unweeded for 12 weeks or more produced significantly greater ( P < 0.05) weed biomass than plots unweeded for 6 weeks. Although the least weed dry weight ( P < 0.05) and the greatest number of weed species were recorded with hand weeding at 2 week intervals, there was no particular benefit on tea growth when compared with hand weeding at 6 and 12 week intervals. Inter row mulching in chemically treated plots was more favorable for tea growth than no mulching, while living weed cover in unmulched slash weeded plots suppressed tea growth. A combination of mulching and herbicides, particularly oxyfluorfen and paraquat, followed by hand weeding at least every 6–8 weeks was considered the most appropriate weed management system for young tea.