How receptive are patients to medical students in A ustralian hospitals? A cross‐sectional survey of a public and a private hospital

Background Medical student numbers in A ustralian universities have more than doubled since 2000. There are concerns about the ability for existing clinical training sites to accommodate this increase in student numbers, and there have been calls to increase training in private hospitals. The receptiveness of patients in private hospitals will influence the success of such placements. Aims We aimed to evaluate whether patients in a private hospital are as receptive to medical students as patients in a public hospital. Methods Cross‐sectional survey of patients conducted at a private and a public teaching hospital in M elbourne, A ustralia. Main outcome measures were willingness to allow a medical student to participate in an interview, physical examination and procedures (electrocardiogram, venepuncture and digital rectal examination), and patient attitudes towards medical students as assessed by a series of 20 attitude statements and a summative attitude score. Results Patients at the private hospital were more willing than patients at the public hospital to allow a medical student to take their history unsupervised (112/146, 76.7% vs 90/141, 63.8%; P = 0.02). The distribution of patient willingness did not otherwise differ between hospitals for physical examination or procedures. There was no difference in the mean attitude score between hospitals (15.3 ± 0.8 private vs 15.4 ± 1.2 public, P = 0.38), and responses differed between hospitals for only four of the 20 attitude statements. Conclusions Our findings suggest that patients in a private hospital are at least as receptive to medical students as patients in a public hospital.