Premium
Teaching asthma management: an evidence‐based educational approach
Author(s) -
Yates D. H.,
Shah S.,
Veitch E.,
Thomas P. S.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
australian and new zealand journal of medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.596
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1445-5994
pISSN - 0004-8291
DOI - 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2000.tb01051.x
Subject(s) - asthma , medicine , session (web analytics) , confidence interval , asthma management , test (biology) , physical therapy , family medicine , paleontology , world wide web , computer science , biology
Background : Asthma management plans and asthma education have been incorporated into recent guidelines, and implementation of these reduces asthma morbidity. Junior doctors are frequently involved in asthma management, but teaching about asthma in medical school is seldom assessed. We studied asthma knowledge, confidence in practical asthma management, and the effectiveness of an interactive asthma education workshop in final year medical students. Thirty‐five students attended the workshop, with 26 returning questionnaires on both of the two sessions. Methods : Students attended a two hour asthma workshop comprising interactive teaching sessions on management of acute and stable asthma, and a practical session using asthma devices. Theoretical knowledge was assessed by a 20 item questionnaire, completed immediately prior to the workshop and after two weeks, at a feedback session. Practical knowledge was assessed by confidence scores in use of asthma devices on a five point scale (not at all confident to very confident), before, immediately after the workshop, and after two weeks. Results : Students scored poorly in questions on: predictors of asthma mortality, nebuliser and Turbuhaler® use, asthma management plans, and physical signs in acute asthma. Mean (SE) knowledge score increased significantly from 64.4% (6.1) to 74.2% (5.6) ( p <0.05; paired t ‐test) at two weeks. Confidence scores rose significantly for all practical aspects of asthma management ( p <0.01; Wilcoxon matched pairs test), and declined at two weeks, but still remained significantly higher than at baseline ( p <0.05). Conclusions : Medical students had poor knowledge about several important features of asthma care. The asthma workshop was effective in increasing knowledge and confidence in management of asthma in the short term, and could be useful in optimising implementation of asthma guidelines in clinical practice and potentially later in training of junior medical officers.