Premium
Is laparoscopic colectomy as cost beneficial as open colectomy?
Author(s) -
Shabbir Asim,
Roslani April C.,
Wong KuttSing,
Tsang Charles B. S.,
Wong HweeBee,
Cheong WaiKit
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
anz journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.426
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1445-2197
pISSN - 1445-1433
DOI - 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.04857.x
Subject(s) - medicine , colectomy , ileus , perioperative , demographics , general surgery , cohort , laparoscopy , surgery , colorectal cancer , cancer , demography , sociology
Background: Laparoscopic colectomy has yet to gain widespread acceptance in cost‐conscious health‐care institutions. The aim of the present study was to define the cost–benefit relationship of laparoscopic versus open colectomy. Methods: Thirty‐two consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colectomy (LC) by a single colorectal surgeon between August 2004 and September 2005 were reviewed. Cases were matched with a historical cohort undergoing elective open colectomy (OC) between June 2003 and July 2004. Demography, perioperative data, histopathology and cost were compared. Results: Both groups had similar demographics. Most resections (90.6%) were for cancer. Operative time was significantly longer for LC compared to OC (180 min vs 110 min, P < 0.001). Four patients (12.5%) in the LC group required conversion. LC patients, however, had lower median pain scores (3, 2 and 1 vs 6, 4 and 2 at 24, 48 and 72 h postoperatively, P < 0.001), faster resolution of ileus (3 vs 4 days, P < 0.001) and earlier discharge (6 vs 9 days, P < 0.001) compared to the OC group. As a result, overall hospital cost for both procedures was not significantly different (US$7943 vs US$7253, P = 0.41). Conclusion: Laparoscopic colectomy is as cost‐beneficial in the short term as open colectomy.