z-logo
Premium
PR29
MASSETERIC‐FACIAL NERVE COAPTATION – AN ALTERNATIVE TECHNIQUE FOR FACIAL NERVE REINNERVATION
Author(s) -
Ek E. W.,
Coombs C. J.,
Wu T.,
Cleland H.,
Leung M. K.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
anz journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.426
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1445-2197
pISSN - 1445-1433
DOI - 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04127_28.x
Subject(s) - medicine , synkinesis , facial nerve , reinnervation , facial muscles , facial paralysis , anatomy , motor nerve , hypoglossal nerve , palsy , surgery , tongue , alternative medicine , pathology
  Facial nerve paralysis can be a disabling condition functionally, psychologically and aesthetically. When there has been an acquired proximal injury to the facial nerve in the presence of previously functional facial musculature, such as in acoustic neuroma surgery, neurotisation of the distal facial nerve is an appropriate choice of management. The hypoglossal nerve is most commonly used. However this is not without its limitations, notably subsequent hemilingual atrophy and facial synkinesis. We present an alternative technique of facial reinnervation utilising a motor branch of the trigeminal nerve, the nerve to masseter. We believe this technique has the potential to overcome problems encountered with use of other extra‐facial nerves. Methods  Three patients with acquired facial nerve palsy following tumour resection underwent transfer of the ipsilateral masseteric nerve to facial nerve. In two patients the nerve was directly coapted to the trunk of the facial nerve while the third patient had transfer to the buccal branch. Results  By twelve months postoperatively all three patients demonstrated significant improvement in facial muscle tone and symmetry at rest. All patients were able to produce a symmetrical smile with minimal synkinesis. Two of the three patients also had evidence of occasional spontaneous movements. Conclusion  Use of the ipsilateral motor nerve to masseter offers an alternative technique for neurotisation of the facial nerve. The advantages of this technique include ease of dissection, constant and reliable anatomy, powerful innervation of the facial muscles, minimal donor site morbidity and the potential for return of spontaneous facial movements.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here