Premium
PM01
SPINAL CORD STIMULATION FOR CHRONIC REFRACTORY ANGINA
Author(s) -
Acland R. H.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
anz journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.426
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1445-2197
pISSN - 1445-1433
DOI - 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04126_1.x
Subject(s) - medicine , angina , spinal cord stimulation , spinal cord stimulator , spinal cord , stimulation , chronic pain , refractory (planetary science) , quality of life (healthcare) , anesthesia , physical therapy , cardiology , myocardial infarction , nursing , physics , psychiatry , astrobiology
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) involves the use of an epidurally placed, multiple electrode lead. Electrical stimulation between electrodes produces stimulation of the posterior spinal cord and can provide excellent pain relief and increased blood flow in a number of chronic limb pain conditions. Its efficacy has more recently been demonstrated in angina. Chronic stable angina pectoris is a major cause of disability and suffering. The aims of treatment are to prevent MI and death (increase the quantity of life) and reduce the symptoms (improve the quality of life). In the non‐acute condition, practitioners often struggle to manage angina because of a lack of understanding of modern concepts of pain. There is a widely held misconception that only revascularisation improves prognosis in chronic refractory angina‐ the term used to describe patients with stable angina that is treatment refractory. Over the last decade two pain services in New Zealand have been approached by cardiologists to provide spinal cord stimulation for such patients. This has been an intriguing experience! We have demonstrated that the placement of such leads in the lower cervical cord region provides excellent relief of angina. The technology is expensive (akin to the overall cost of CAVG surgery). We have demonstrated cost recoupment, by decreased hospitalisation, at approximately16 months post procedure. Sadly, this therapy has not been embraced. Possible reasons for this will be discussed. The concept of electrically modifying the neuronal signals versus re‐plumbing the blockage appears to be an anathema to cardiologists.