Premium
GS27P
TECHNIQUES FOR CLOSURE OF MIDLINE ABDOMINAL INCISIONS
Author(s) -
Ali A.,
Tait N.,
Sanfilippo F.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
anz journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.426
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1445-2197
pISSN - 1445-1433
DOI - 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04119_27.x
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , absorbable suture , fibrous joint , incisional hernia , laparotomy , dehiscence , closure (psychology) , abdominal wall , economics , market economy
Background A recent meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials of abdominal fascial closures concluded that in order to reduce incisional hernia rates without increasing wound pain, or the rate of dehiscence slowly absorbable continuous sutures appear to achieve the best results in abdominal fascial closures. We surveyed the techniques for abdominal fascial closure among general surgeons in Canberra, Australia. Methodology 49 out of 80 surgeons responded to the survey by form. The information collected included the seniority of the surgeon, the frequency of laparotomy closure, surgical technique and suture material utilised in abdominal fascial closure. Results 34 (69%) of the surgeons surveyed preferred a non‐absorbable monofilament suture material for abdominal fascial closure with nylon being the most popular. Most (38, 78%) also preferred a non‐absorbable monofilament suture in emergency surgery. 12 (24%) surgeons preferred to use slowly absorbable suture. The majority of surgeons (37, 76%) preferred continuous suture technique, whilst only 2 (4%) used continuous followed by interrupted suture closures. Only 5 (10%) complied with the dual recommendation of continuous suture technique and slowly absorbable suture. Conclusion The majority of surgeons preferred non‐absorbable monofilament suture rather than slowly absorbable suture. Only 1 in 10 surgeons complied with both components of evidence base, which supports the use of slowly absorbable suture material and a continuous technique in abdominal fascial closure. A definitive RCT would confirm this observation.