z-logo
Premium
BS06
PATIENT‐RATED OUTCOME MEASURES WERE MORE SENSITIVE THAN CLINICIAN‐RATED MEASURES AT DISTINGUISHING THE EFFECTS OF SENTINEL NODE BIOPSY AND AXILLARY CLEARANCE IN THE SNAC TRIAL
Author(s) -
Smith M. J.,
Gill P. G.,
Wetzig N.,
Sourjina T.,
Simes R. J.,
Stockler M. R.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
anz journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.426
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1445-2197
pISSN - 1445-1433
DOI - 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04114_6.x
Subject(s) - medicine , clinical endpoint , quality of life (healthcare) , sentinel node , randomized controlled trial , breast cancer , clinical trial , physical therapy , cancer , surgery , nursing
Purpose  We sought to determine which outcome measures were most sensitive at detecting the benefits of Sentinel node based management (SNBM) over routine axillary clearance (RAC) in the SNAC trial. Patients and Methods  1088 women with early breast cancer were randomised to either SNBM or RAC. The primary endpoint was the percent increase in arm volume based on clinicians’ measurements of arm circumference at 10cm intervals. Secondary endpoints included patients self‐ratings of arm swelling and other aspects of quality of life, assessed using the SNAC Study Specific Scales (SSSS: 15 questions asking about symptoms, dysfunction and disabilities). We report a comparison of the relative sensitivity of these endpoints in detecting differences between the treatment groups. Results  Patients’ ratings on the SSSS were 3.2 times as sensitive as clinicians’ ratings of arm swelling, requiring 68% fewer patients to detect a given treatment effect. The 7 questions asking patients about symptoms were most sensitive. Questions asking about dysfunctions and disabilities were less sensitive. Conclusion  Patient‐rated measures were more sensitive in this trial than clinician‐rated measures at distinguishing the effects of SNBM and RAC. Similar trials would require only a third as many patients if the primary endpoint was rated by patients rather than clinicians.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here