Premium
CURRENT MANAGEMENT OF BLUNT SPLENIC TRAUMA IN CHILDREN
Author(s) -
Thompson Stephen R.,
Holland Andrew J. A.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
anz journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.426
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1445-2197
pISSN - 1445-1433
DOI - 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03647.x
Subject(s) - medicine , blunt , current (fluid) , surgery , engineering , electrical engineering
Background: Non‐operative management of the great majority of blunt splenic injuries in children has become routine. Debate continues on the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, follow‐up imaging and the duration of physical activity restrictions following injury. The purpose of this study was to review the recent experience of an Australian Paediatric Trauma Centre with splenic trauma to define current practice. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients with splenic trauma admitted to the Children's Hospital at Westmead between November 1995 and December 2003. Results: A total of 39 patients with blunt splenic trauma were identified: 20 (51%) were multiply injured. Thirty‐three (85%) children were managed non‐operatively. The most common initial imaging method was computed tomography ( n = 28, 72%). Fourteen patients (36%) were admitted to the ICU with a mean length of stay (LOS) of 4.1 days (range 1–13 days). The overall mean LOS was 10.8 days (range 1–43 days). Nineteen patients (50%) had imaging studies performed after diagnosis but before discharge. Further post‐discharge imaging was carried out in 21 cases (54%). There were no deaths, but 10 patients developed complications. The mean documented activity restriction was 7.4 weeks (range 1–16 weeks). Conclusion: The majority of children who had suffered blunt splenic trauma were safely managed non‐operatively outside an ICU. In stable patients, there appeared to be no benefits associated with repeated imaging following the diagnosis of splenic trauma. Physical activity restriction in excess of 3–4 weeks did not appear to be warranted.