z-logo
Premium
THE MORBIDITY OF DEFUNCTIONING STOMATA
Author(s) -
Chen Frank,
Stuart Malcolm
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
australian and new zealand journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.111
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1445-2197
pISSN - 0004-8682
DOI - 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1996.tb01168.x
Subject(s) - medicine , ileostomy , colostomy , stoma (medicine) , resection , colorectal surgery , surgery , colorectal cancer , loop (graph theory) , general surgery , abdominal surgery , cancer , mathematics , combinatorics
Background: The choice of a defunctioning stoma in restorative resection of rectal carcinoma is unclear. Traditionally, the loop colostomy has been preferred. Methods: All patients with either a defunctioning loop ileostomy or colostomy treated by a single surgeon (MS) were studied. The morbidity of stoma construction and closure, as well as problems experienced in the intervening period, were entered on a database. Results: No significant difference in the morbidity of closure was noted when loop ileostomy was compared to loop colostomy. Although a trend favouring loop ileostomy was noted when interval morbidity was examined, this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Loop colostomy and ileostomy are both effective in defunctioning the distal colon following a restorative resection for rectal carcinoma. There is some morbidity associated with both but when a stoma is constructed, loop ileostomy is preferable. The loop ileostomy is generally easier to manage and is not associated with a greater rate of complications (in its construction and closure) than the loop colostomy.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here