Premium
Is it proper to use non‐magnified narrow‐band imaging for esophageal neoplasia screening? Japanese single‐center, prospective study
Author(s) -
Yokoyama Akira,
Ichimasa Katsuro,
Ishiguro Tomonari,
Mori Yuichi,
Ikeda Haruo,
Hayashi Takemasa,
Minami Hitomi,
Hayashi Seiko,
Watanabe Gen,
Inoue Haruhiro,
Kudo Shinei
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
digestive endoscopy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.5
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1443-1661
pISSN - 0915-5635
DOI - 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01309.x
Subject(s) - medicine , endoscopy , narrow band imaging , prospective cohort study , gastroenterology , nuclear medicine , radiology
Aim: Most screening examinations in Japanese general hospitals are carried out by high‐definition television‐incompatible (non‐HD) scopes and non‐magnifying endoscopes. We evaluated the narrow‐band imaging (NBI) real‐time diagnostic yield of esophageal neoplasia in high‐risk patients at a general hospital. Methods: In a single‐center, prospective, non‐randomized controlled trial, 117 consecutive screening patients with high risk for esophageal cancer received primary white‐light imaging (WLI) followed by NBI and iodine‐staining endoscopy (59 by HDTV‐compatible [HD] endoscopy and 58 by non‐HD endoscopy). The primary aim was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of non‐magnified images in diagnosing esophageal neoplasia. The secondary aim was to compare HD endoscopy and non‐HD endoscopy in terms of diagnostic performance. Results: Overall, the sensitivity of NBI for screening of esophageal neoplasia was superior to WLI, and equivalent to iodine staining (92% vs 42%; P < 0.05, 92% vs 100%; ns). The specificity of NBI was equivalent to WLI (89% vs 94%; ns). In HD, NBI sensitivity was equivalent to both iodine staining and WLI (100% vs 75%; ns). In non‐HD, NBI sensitivity was equivalent to iodine staining, but WLI sensitivity was significantly inferior to NBI (88% vs 100%; ns, 25% vs 88%; P < 0.05). The NBI specificity was equivalent to WLI not only in HD but also in non‐HD (90% vs 96%; ns, 88% vs 93%; ns). Conclusion: In both HD and non‐HD endoscopy, NBI is less likely than WLI to miss a lesion. Even with non‐HD endoscopy, NBI is suitable for esophageal standard examinations in general hospitals.