Premium
Experience with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Author(s) -
YAMAKAWA Tatsuo,
TAN Daniel,
ISHIKAWA Yasuro,
SAKAI Shigeru
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
digestive endoscopy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.5
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1443-1661
pISSN - 0915-5635
DOI - 10.1111/j.1443-1661.1991.tb00287.x
Subject(s) - medicine , cystic duct , cystic artery , subcutaneous emphysema , cholecystectomy , surgery , gallbladder , general surgery , clipping (morphology) , pneumothorax , pouch , bile duct , linguistics , philosophy
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is rapidly replacing conventional cholecystectomy as the treatment of choice for gallbladder stone disease because of its lower morbidity. Our study began on 29th May, 1990 and continued until February 28th, 1991. 40 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were successfuly performed. 4 patients had an open cholecystectomy instead because of bleeding in 1, dense adhesions in 2 and Mirizzi's Syndrome in 1. The two technical measures taken to avoid common bile duct injury, were 1) exposure of both the cystic duct and cystic artery in the same field before clipping and division 2) demonstration of the continuity between the cystic duct and the Hartman's pouch. Technical difficulties often encountered were extensive adhesions, multiple or giant stones, inflamed gallbladder and a short or dilated cystic duct. There were 4 complications; one diaphragmatic injury resulting in a pneumothorax, one periumbilical subcutaneous emphysema and 2 mild bile leaks. On average, each patient required 1.3 intramuscular analgesic injections and spent 10 days recuperating in hospital. In Japan, many patients insist on staying longer in hospital. We believe that laparoscopic cholecystectomy will rapidly become the preferred treatment for gallbladder stone disease.