z-logo
Premium
Trophic ecology of parabiotic ants: Do the partners have similar food niches?
Author(s) -
MENZEL FLORIAN,
STAAB MICHAEL,
CHUNG ARTHUR Y. C.,
GEBAUER GERHARD,
BLÜTHGEN NICO
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
austral ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.688
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1442-9993
pISSN - 1442-9985
DOI - 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02290.x
Subject(s) - trophic level , biology , ecology , ecological niche , competition (biology) , niche , food web , foraging , niche differentiation , mutualism (biology) , food chain , nest (protein structural motif) , habitat , biochemistry
Organisms associated with another species may experience both costs and benefits from their partner. One of these costs is competition, which is the more likely if the two species are ecologically similar. Parabioses are associations between two ant species that share a nest and often attend the same food sources. Albeit parabioses are probably mutualistic, parabiotic partners may compete for food. We therefore investigated feeding niches and dietary overlap of two parabiotically associated ants in Borneo using cafeteria experiments and stable isotope analyses. The two species strongly differed in their food choices. While Crematogaster modiglianii mostly foraged at carbohydrate‐rich baits, Camponotus rufifemur preferred urea‐rich sources. Both species also consumed animal protein. The 15 N concentration in Ca. rufifemur workers was consistently lower than in Cr. modiglianii . Camponotus rufifemur but not Cr. modiglianii possesses microbial endosymbionts, which can metabolize urea and synthesize essential amino acids. Its lower 15 N signature may result from a relatively higher intake of plant‐based or otherwise 15 N‐depleted nitrogen. Isotopic signatures of the two partners in the same parabiosis showed strongly parallel variation across nests. As we did not find evidence for spatial autocorrelation, this correlation suggests an overlap of food sources between the two ant species. Based on model simulations, we estimated a diet overlap of 22–66% for nitrogen sources and 45–74% for carbon sources. The overlap may arise from either joint exploitation of the same food sources or trophallactic exchange of food. This suggests an intense trophic interaction and potential for competition between the parabiotic partners.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here