Premium
Cyclone damage sustained by riparian revegetation sites in the Tully‐Murray floodplain, Queensland, Australia
Author(s) -
BRUCE CAROLINE,
KROON FREDERIEKE,
SYDES DAMON,
FORD ANDREW
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
austral ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.688
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1442-9993
pISSN - 1442-9985
DOI - 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2008.01906.x
Subject(s) - revegetation , riparian zone , tropical cyclone , floodplain , environmental science , rainforest , ecology , hydrology (agriculture) , geography , geology , biology , habitat , meteorology , ecological succession , geotechnical engineering
Cyclones have been instrumental in shaping the structural and floristic composition of tropical forests, including tropical rainforests of north Queensland, Australia. The response of tropical riparian rehabilitation sites to cyclonic wind damage, however, is currently unknown. This lack of knowledge may severely hamper long‐term success of riparian restoration efforts, particularly in light of predictions that cyclones in north Queensland may become less frequent but more severe. In this study, we examined the extent, type and magnitude of damage inflicted on revegetation works in the Tully‐Murray floodplain of north Queensland by Severe Tropical Cyclone Larry. We compared wind damaged in 20 paired revegetated and associated rainforest remnant sites, using (i) gross community damage scores, (ii) mean weighted damage scores, and (iii) type of damage sustained by individual plants. Overall, wind damage due to Severe Tropical Cyclone Larry was surprisingly similar in revegetated and remnant sites. Both gross community damage scores and mean weighted damage scores did not differ between paired revegetated and remnant sites. In contrast, the type of damage sustained by individual plants was not independent of site, with a larger proportion in revegetated sites sustaining severe damage compared with remnant sites. This larger proportion of severely damaged individuals in revegetated sites was at least in part due to the significantly higher proportion of pioneers at these sites. The pioneer species Homalanthus novoguineensis was particularly susceptible to wind damage. The potential effects of spatial differences, such as consistent bias due to size, shape or exposure between the remnants and revegetated sites, on our results are discussed. In light of our results, we recommend that future revegetation sites include fewer pioneer species that are highly susceptible to wind damage, more pioneer species that are resistant to wind damage, and alteration of pioneer species distribution within planting matrices.