Premium
Fine‐scale microhabitat selection for dense vegetation in a heathland rodent, Rattus lutreolus : Insights from intraspecific and temporal patterns
Author(s) -
KEARNEY NICOLE,
HANDASYDE KATHRINE,
WARD SIMON,
KEARNEY MICHAEL
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
austral ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.688
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1442-9993
pISSN - 1442-9985
DOI - 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01697.x
Subject(s) - vegetation (pathology) , ecology , ecological succession , habitat , intraspecific competition , abundance (ecology) , biology , medicine , pathology
Vegetation is a dynamic habitat component and successional changes in vegetation structure can lead to concomitant changes in the communities of animals living in a particular area. Heathland rodents are a classic example, with vegetation at different ages post fire being dominated by different species. While broad associations are often demonstrated between the distribution and abundance of species and vegetation structure, the causal relationships are poorly understood. Studies of temporal and sex‐ or age‐specific patterns can provide strong insights into the processes underling patterns of habitat selection. In an attempt to better understand the mechanistic links between rodent successional patterns and vegetation structure in heathlands, we conducted a detailed study of microhabitat use by the swamp rat, Rattus lutreolus , in a native heathland in south‐eastern Australia. Rattus lutreolus typically occurs in late‐succession heath and is frequently associated with high vegetation density. Our assessment of vegetation at trapping stations, and also along trails used by the animals (using the spool‐and‐line tracking technique), revealed strong selection by the rats for dense vegetation by both day and night. The spool‐and‐line tracking approach revealed distinct intraspecific and temporal patterns. During the day, females foraged in vegetation of much higher density than did juveniles, with males behaving intermediately. During the night, however, all animals selected dense vegetation irrespective of sex or age, although the mean density of vegetation selected during the night was lower than it was during the day. These patterns were independent of daily maximum and minimum air temperature and were therefore unlikely to be related to microclimate. We propose instead that high vegetation density acts as a source of protection from predators, allowing R. lutreolus to forage safely both by day and by night.