z-logo
Premium
Comparison of habitat selection by two sympatric macropods, Thylogale billardierii and Macropus rufogriseus rufogriseus, in a patchy eucalypt‐forestry environment
Author(s) -
LE MAR KIRSTEN,
MCARTHUR CLARE
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
austral ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.688
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1442-9993
pISSN - 1442-9985
DOI - 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2005.01510.x
Subject(s) - macropus , sympatric speciation , habitat , ecology , biology , range (aeronautics) , population , interspecific competition , home range , marsupial , materials science , demography , sociology , composite material
  Population density estimates and patterns of habitat selection by sympatric red‐bellied pademelons ( Thylogale billardierii (Marsupialia: Macropodidae)) and red‐necked wallabies ( Macropus rufogriseus rufogriseus (Marsupialia: Macropodidae)) were examined within a patchy forestry environment in north‐west Tasmania. Population density of both species was relatively high. Selection indices from both population surveys and animal movement data showed that T. billardierii and M. rufogriseus had similar patterns of habitat selection at two spatio‐temporal scales; home range within the study area and habitats selected while foraging at night. Both species selected for young Eucalyptus nitens plantation with high weed‐cover within their home range. At night, T. billardierii and M. rufogriseus selected for open habitats (young plantation and grassland) and avoided closed habitats (native forest and 5–7 years old E. nitens plantation). There was no evidence for resource partitioning between species at these scales. In contrast, the two species differed in their selection for daytime sheltering habitat; T. billardierii selected native forest while M. rufogriseus selected older plantation. This may reflect differences in their predator avoidance strategies; that is, crypsis versus flight, rather than resource partitioning as a result of interspecific competition. The environment appears to be of high quality for both species, with patches of feeding and shelter habitats within close proximity of one another.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here