A comparison of two methods for sampling assemblages of subterranean, wood‐eating termites (Isoptera)

Within a 50 × 50 m area of wandoo Eucalyptus capillosa woodland in the Western Australian wheatbelt, the diversity and frequency of occurrence of wood‐eating termite species was assessed at two food types. Over a 12 month period, monthly termite activity was determined: (i) at sound/undecayed artificial baits (seasoned wooden stakes of Jarrah, Karri, Pine, Batu, Oregon; Jarrah sawdust; paper rolls); and (li) at naturally occurring timber, fallen logs and branches of wandoo, in varying stages of decay. Termite diversity was 11 species at baits, 18 species at wandoo out of an overall site richness of 21 species. Karri attracted the most species (9); sawdust attracted none. At wandoo, Nasutitermes exitiosus, Coptotermes acinaciformis and Occasitermes occasus accounted for 59% of samples where termites were recorded. At baits, Heterotermes occiduus accounted for a mean of 80% of samples across bait types, but was rarely sampled at wandoo (5% of samples). Only H. occiduus, C. acinaciformis and Amitermes neogermanus ate bait. Pine, Oregon and paper rolls were most effective in attracting foraging termites in terms of highest per cent of replicates showing bait consumption and highest consumption rates. Jarrah and Batu were least attractive to foraging termites. Samples from wandoo underestimated the relative frequency of occurrence of H. occiduus within the study site. Coptotermes acinaciformis , which attack large food items, and certain species of Amitermes , which forage on subterranean food, may have been underestimated by both sampling methods. These findings indicate that a proper understanding of the structure of wood‐eating termite assemblages within a given area requires a composite sampling strategy which addresses termites that eat sound or decayed wood, as well as surface and subsurface foragers.