Ecological paradoxes *

Two controversial areas of ecology are examined critically to ascertain the limits of some current theories. In the field of population ecology it is argued that no general theory can explain the regulation of animal numbers. Existing theories are considered inadequate because either (1) evidence points to multiple causes rather than a single cause, (2) propositions lose scientific appeal by accumulating qualifiers, or (3) conflicting theories are irrefutable in scientific inquiry. Different research strategies are required to discover generalities in population regulation. In the field of community organization it is pointed out that too much emphasis on the competitive exclusion principle has blinded ecologists from the clustering of resources and of species populations. Conditions of co‐existence as well as segregation are considered important in the organization of communities, which allow elements of chance in small scale distribution. The ecological world is likened to the physical world in which small scale disorder leads to order on a large scale. For the development of a global ecology the acceleration of studies in the tropics and the southern hemisphere is urged.