Premium
MACULAR ELECTRORETINOGRAMS: THEIR ACCURACY, SPECIFICITY AND IMPLEMENTATION FOR CLINICAL USE
Author(s) -
BILLSON F.,
KEMP S.,
MORGAN M.,
MB M. DONNELLEY,
MONTGOMERY P.
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
australian journal of opthalmology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.3
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1442-9071
pISSN - 0310-1177
DOI - 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1984.tb01182.x
Subject(s) - erg , electroretinography , ophthalmology , retinal , optic neuritis , medicine , electrophysiology , blind spot , optic nerve , optometry , optics , physics , multiple sclerosis , psychiatry
The pattern and the focal electroretinogram (ERG) are both non‐invasive, electrophysiological responses recorded from circumscribed retinal areas and are most easily recorded from the macula. This paper describes how our department has incorporated these tests into our clinical protocol, shows how the recording technique and the method of electrode construction may be improved, and describes the normal limits of the macular responses we obtain. The ERG signal‐noise ratio we obtained was better than that of the binocular visual evoked potentials (VEPs) recorded simultaneously. Pattern and focal ERGs, using improved methods of recording, show promise of being a valuable addition to the clinical investigation of subtle maculopathies and some forms of optic nerve dysfunction. Three illustrative cases are described. The first demonstrates normal macular ERG responses with abnormal Ganzfeld ERGs due to peripheral retinal damage. The second reveals differential pattern ERG reduction with normal focal ERG in recent optic neuritis. The third case demonstrates reversible simultaneous loss of Ganzfeld ERGs and macular ERGs in vitamin A deficiency.