Premium
Using broad‐scale, community survey data to compare species conservation strategies across regions: A case study of the Koala in a set of adjacent ‘catchments’
Author(s) -
Crowther Mathew S.,
McAlpine Clive A.,
Lunney Daniel,
Shan Ian,
Bryant Jessica V.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
ecological management and restoration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.472
H-Index - 42
eISSN - 1442-8903
pISSN - 1442-7001
DOI - 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2009.00465.x
Subject(s) - phascolarctos cinereus , wildlife , habitat , geography , wildlife management , ecology , scale (ratio) , wildlife conservation , conservation plan , population , environmental resource management , drainage basin , environmental science , cartography , biology , demography , sociology
Summary Managers of wildlife populations with a wide geographical range are understandably interested in the question of whether they can manage a broader population with a single conservation strategy (e.g. covering a set of adjacent management regions, referred to as ‘catchments’ in Australia) or whether separate strategies are required for individual catchments. We addressed this question using data from a statewide, community wildlife survey to quantify Koala ( Phascolarctos cinereus ) habitat relationships in the catchments of four adjacent Catchment Management Authorities or CMA (>10 000 km 2 ) of New South Wales, Australia and then tested whether these habitat relationships were similar across catchments. Although the results were constrained by the coarse resolution of the community survey and environmental data, we were able to model broad‐scale patterns of habitat use. Model explanatory power and cross‐regional predictability was low, but consistent with Koala ecology. Two environmental variables emerged as having a strong relationship with Koala presence – mean elevation and percentage of fertile soils – the importance of which varied among catchments depending on land‐use patterns. The results highlight the need for local wildlife management plans, not a single plan covering multiple catchments.