Premium
The efficacy and safety of tiotropium in Chinese patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
WU Qibiao,
LI Guochun,
LEI Wun I.,
ZHOU Xiqiao
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
respirology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.857
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1440-1843
pISSN - 1323-7799
DOI - 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2009.01525.x
Subject(s) - medicine , ipratropium , tiotropium bromide , copd , placebo , adverse effect , meta analysis , anticholinergic , relative risk , randomized controlled trial , bronchodilator , population , anesthesia , asthma , confidence interval , lung , lung function , alternative medicine , environmental health , pathology
Background and objective: Tiotropium is the only long‐acting inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator currently available in China, but information about its clinical effect in this population is limited. This meta‐analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of tiotropium in Chinese patients with stable COPD. Methods: An electronic search of the literature was undertaken to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of tiotropium in Chinese patients, which were then assessed for inclusion in a meta‐analysis. The efficacy and safety of tiotropium was compared with placebo and ipratropium, using the outcomes of FEV 1 , FEV 1 %, symptoms, frequency of exacerbations, adverse events and safety. Results: Eleven RCTs recruiting 1006 patients were included in the meta‐analysis. Compared with both placebo and ipratropium, tiotropium significantly improved FEV 1 [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 304 mL, 95% CI 271–337], FEV 1 % (WMD = 8.35%, 95% CI 5.40–11.31) and symptoms [relative risk (RR) = 2.00, 95% CI 1.61–2.49]. Tiotropium significantly reduced the risk of exacerbations (RR = 0.07, 95% CI 0.01–0.54) compared with placebo, and there was a non‐significant reduction in the risk of exacerbations compared with ipratropium (RR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.13–3.75). Tiotropium was well tolerated with a similar safety profile to placebo and ipratropium (RR = 1.16, 95% CI 0.76–1.77, P = 0.49). Conclusions: Tiotropium improved pulmonary function and symptoms, reduced exacerbations and was well tolerated and safe. On the basis of its efficacy and safety profile, tiotropium appears to be a reasonable first‐line choice for the management of Chinese patients with stable COPD. Additional long‐term RCTs are required to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of tiotropium.