Premium
Confirmation of cultivated Porphyra tenera (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) by polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism analyses of the plastid and nuclear DNA
Author(s) -
Niwa Kyosuke,
Kobiyama Atsushi,
Aruga Yusho
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
phycological research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.438
H-Index - 44
eISSN - 1440-1835
pISSN - 1322-0829
DOI - 10.1111/j.1440-183.2005.00397.x
Subject(s) - tenera , porphyra , biology , plastid , restriction fragment length polymorphism , rubisco , internal transcribed spacer , polymerase chain reaction , nuclear dna , amplified fragment length polymorphism , genetics , botany , gene , mitochondrial dna , algae , chloroplast , ribosomal rna , genetic diversity , agroforestry , population , demography , palm oil , sociology
SUMMARY Polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR‐RFLP) analysis of the plastid ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBisCo) spacer region was developed for a more reliable and rapid species identification of cultivated Porphyra in combination with PCR‐RFLP analysis of the nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region. From the PCR‐RFLP analyses of the plastid and nuclear DNA, we examined seven strains of conchocelis that were used for cultivation as Porphyra tenera Kjellman but without strict species identification. The PCR‐RFLP analyses suggested that two strains, C‐32 and 90‐02, were cultivated P. tenera and that the other five strains, C‐24, C‐28, C‐29, C‐30 and M‐1, were Porphyra yezoensis f. narawaensis Miura. To identify species more accurately and to reveal additional genetic variation, the two strains C‐32 and 90‐02 were further studied by sequencing their RuBisCo spacer and ITS‐1 regions. Although RuBisCo spacer sequences of the two strains were identical to each other, each of their ITS‐1 sequences showed a single substitution. The sequence data again confirmed that the two strains (C‐32 and 90‐02) were cultivated P. tenera , and suggested that the two strains showed some genetic variation. We concluded that PCR‐RFLP analysis of the plastid and nuclear DNA is a powerful tool for reliable and rapid species identification of many strains of cultivated Porphyra in Japan and for the collection of genetically variable breeding material of Porphyra .