Premium
Retroperitoneal schwannoma is characterized by a high incidence of cellular type and GFAP‐immunoreactivity
Author(s) -
Hirose Takanori,
Ishizawa Keisuke,
Sakaki Mika,
Fujii Yoshiyuki
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
pathology international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.73
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1440-1827
pISSN - 1320-5463
DOI - 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2012.02822.x
Subject(s) - schwannoma , pathology , glial fibrillary acidic protein , immunohistochemistry , differential diagnosis , sox10 , biology , anatomy , schwann cell , cell type , medicine , cell , microbiology and biotechnology , embryo , neural crest , genetics
To clarify the clinicopathologic characteristics of retroperitoneal schwannomas, which are sometimes confused with other spindle cell tumors, 27 cases were studied microscopically and immunohistochemically. The 27 cases consisted of 17 females and 10 males, the ages of whom ranged from 31–79 (mean 57.4) years. Gross examination revealed well‐demarcated, encapsulated tumors, 3–15 cm (mean 8 cm) in diameter. Microscopic review divided them into 13 cases of cellular/fascicular, 3 of conventional, 6 of intermediate, and 5 of ancient type. Cellular/fascicular schwannomas were composed of cellular fascicles of spindle cells, in which nuclear palisading, Antoni B area and cyst were unclear, while numerous foamy cells were intermingled. Immunohistochemical investigation revealed diffuse, strong positivity for S‐100 protein and Sox10 in all tumors studied. In addition, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was extensively expressed in 92% of the cellular/fascicular type, while it was less prominent in others. The present study suggests that retroperitoneal schwannoma often occurs in the middle‐aged woman, grows to a large size, exhibits cellular/fascicular microscopic features in half of the cases, and may arise from GFAP‐positive Schwann cells. The presence of hyalinized vessels and dense infiltration of foamy macrophages as well as diffuse immunoreactivity for S‐100 protein and Sox10 are helpful for the differential diagnosis.