Premium
Macrophages in Langerhans cell histiocytosis are differentiated toward M2 phenotype: Their possible involvement in pathological processes
Author(s) -
Ohnishi Koji,
Komohara Yoshihiro,
Sakashita Naomi,
Iyama Kenichi,
Murayama Toshihiko,
Takeya Motohiro
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
pathology international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.73
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1440-1827
pISSN - 1320-5463
DOI - 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2009.02472.x
Subject(s) - cd163 , langerhans cell histiocytosis , macrophage , stat3 , pathology , giant cell , stat protein , macrophage colony stimulating factor , immunohistochemistry , histiocytosis , phenotype , biology , cytokine , cancer research , immunology , microbiology and biotechnology , signal transduction , medicine , in vitro , gene , disease , biochemistry
Although numerous macrophages are found in the lesions of Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), their activation phenotypes and their roles in the disease process have not been clarified. Paraffin‐embedded LCH samples were examined on immunohistochemistry and it was found that CD163 can be used to distinguish infiltrated macrophages from neoplastic Langerhans cells (LC). The number of CD163‐positve macrophages was positively correlated with the number of multinucleated giant cells (MGC), indicating that most MGC are derived from infiltrated macrophages. A significant number of CD163‐positive macrophages were positive for interleukin (IL)‐10 and phospho‐signal transducer and activator of transcription‐3 (pSTAT3), an IL‐10‐induced signal transduction molecule. This indicates that these macrophages are polarized to anti‐inflammatory macrophages of M2 phenotype. Tumor‐derived macrophage–colony‐stimulating factor (M‐CSF) was considered to responsible for inducing M2 differentiation of infiltrated macrophages. The number of CD163‐positive macrophages in different cases of LCH varied, and interestingly the density of CD163‐positive macrophages was inversely correlated with the Ki‐67‐positivity of LC. Although the underlying mechanism is not fully elucidated, macrophage‐derived IL‐10 was considered to be involved in the suppression of tumor cell proliferation via activation of STAT3.