Premium
Competence and Responsibility in Schizophrenia
Author(s) -
Gross Gisela,
Huber Gerd
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
psychiatry and clinical neurosciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.609
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1440-1819
pISSN - 1323-1316
DOI - 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1994.tb03035.x
Subject(s) - psychology , competence (human resources) , doctrine , psychiatry , social psychology , law , political science
In a survey of the historical background it is shown that the classical doctrine on responsibility in schizophrenia has left its mark on the wordings of the psychiatric textbooks of the different countries. Closely combined with the imputation of enduring irresponsibility in schizophrenia was the opinion that civil rights are largely suspended if a person is given the diagnosis of schizophrenia. By the more recent research results of the studies of course and long‐term outcome of schizophrenia and related psychoses and the development of the basic symptom concept has shown that it is not justified on principle to summarily deprive a person, diagnosed as schizophrenia, of civil rights as well as of criminal responsibility. New directions and some guidelines for an adequate assessment of competence and responsibility in schizophrenia are described. The knowledge of the newer findings and the application and utilization of the concept of basic symptoms and non‐psychotic basic stages enable to overcome the doctrines of incurability, principle heterogeneity and numinous singularity and may lead to a rather appropriate and adequate social appreciation of the disease. Insight, freedom, responsibility, and competence of a person diagnosed as schizophrenia are in the postpsychotic pure residues and basic stages much more frequently preserved and available than hitherto assumed. After remission of the florid schizophrenic phase in the postpsychotic basic stages which are psychopathologically not schizophrenic competence as far as civil rights are concerned is usually not yet lost and criminal irresponsibility cannot be assumed immediately without a careful examination of the defendant: Not only the deed and the diagnosis, but also the psychopathological type and stage of the disorder and the individual behind the act including the psychological and social circumstances of the crime have to be taken into consideration. A dogmatizing either‐or‐principle: Irresponsibility of organic and endogenous psychoses, responsibility of psychic‐reactive, neurotic and psychopathic developments would be a formalism and show a lack of discrimination that could not do justice to the reality and the very different psychopathological and social types and stages in schizophrenia.