Premium
Anti‐Manic and Prophylactic Effects of Carbamazepine (Tegretol) on Manic Depressive Psychosis A Preliminary Report
Author(s) -
Okuma Teruo,
Kishimoto Akira,
Kinuo Inoue. M.D.,
Hisashi Matsumoto,
Atsushi Ogura,
Toji Matsushita,
Nakao Takehisa,
Chikara Ogura
Publication year - 1973
Publication title -
psychiatry and clinical neurosciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.609
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1440-1819
pISSN - 1323-1316
DOI - 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1973.tb02661.x
Subject(s) - carbamazepine , lithium (medication) , psychosis , medicine , prophylactic treatment , bipolar disorder , manic depressive psychosis , drug , psychiatry , pediatrics , psychology , epilepsy
SUMMARY1). The anti‐manic, anti‐depressive and prophylactic effects of carbamazepine (CAZP, Tegretol‐Ciba Geigy) on the endogenous mani‐depressive psychosis (MDP) were investigated on 50 MDP cases. The dosage of the drug ranged from 200 to 1,200 mg daily (usually 400 to 600 mg). 2). The effect of CAZP on 33 manic states was: “markedly effective” seven (23%), “effective” six (19%), “slightly effective” five (16%), “ineffective” 13 (42%), whereas the effect on six depressive states was: “markedly effective” one and “ineffective” five. No definite relationship was found between the kinds of drugs in combination use and the effect of CAZP. No significant difference of the CAZP effect was found in the four patient groups with different age of onset of the illness, nor among the “continuous,”“frequent” and “periodic” type cases. 3). The prophylactic effect of CAZP on 27 cases in which the assessment of the effect on the manic episode was possible was: “markedly effective” 13 (48%), “effective” seven (26%) and “ineffective” seven (26%), whereas that for depressive episode was: 12 (45%), two (7%) and 13 (48%), and the result of the general assessment on each patient was 14 (43%), 10 (30%) and nine (27%), respectively. The kinds of drugs in combination use, age of onset and type of course of the illness did not have any influence on the prophylactic effect of CAZP. 4). The prophylactic effect on MDP of CAZP did not parallel that of lithium salt, but CAZP may be effective on cases which did not respond to lithium and vice versa . 5). Side‐effects such as ataxia, dizziness, exanthema, drowsiness and headache were observed in five of the cases, and the CAZP was discontinued in four of them. 6). The mechanism of effectiveness of the CAZP on MDP was discussed.