Premium
Immunohistochemical evaluation of the microvascular density through the expression of TGF‐β (CD 105/endoglin) and CD 34 receptors and expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in oligodendrogliomas
Author(s) -
Corteze Netto Gabriel,
Birlem Bleil Cristina,
Hilbig Arlete,
Barbosa Coutinho Lígia Maria
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
neuropathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.701
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1440-1789
pISSN - 0919-6544
DOI - 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2007.00825.x
Subject(s) - endoglin , angiogenesis , cd34 , immunohistochemistry , vascular endothelial growth factor , pathology , receptor , medicine , biology , cancer research , vegf receptors , microbiology and biotechnology , stem cell
Angiogenesis has been proposed as essential for the growth of solid tumors. The determinants of this process, the growth factors and the vascular endothelial receptors have brought a potential in the tumor prognostic determination as well as perspectives of “targets” for antiangiogenic therapy. In oligodendrogliomas (OL), angiogenesis is little known and/or has generated conflicting results. In order to clarify angiogenesis in OL, we have evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the microvascular density (MVD) through the expression of TGF‐β (CD105/endoglin) (MVD‐CD105) and CD34 (MVD‐CD34) receptors using the Chalkley point method in 30 OL. No significant immune reaction was found for the VEGF. There was expression in <10% of tumor cells and/or staining of weak intensity in 15 (50.0%), >10% of cells and moderate intensity staining in 1 (3.33%), and negative expression in 14 (46.67%). If present, the expression was restricted to tumor and endothelial cells. Our findings suggest that VEGF has little influence on OL angiogenesis. All specimens showed CD105 and CD34 expression in the intratumor vascular endothelium, suggesting involvement of CD105 in OL angiogenesis. The mean ± SD MVD‐CD105 and MVD‐CD34 were 10.83 ± 2.24 and 11.00 ± 2.76 in OL ( P = 0.086; r = 0.319); 10.00 ± 2.00 and 10.40 ± 3.02 in OL grade II ( n = 15) ( P = 0.547; r = 0.105), and 11.67 ± 2.22 and 11.53 ± 2.45 in OL grade III ( n = 15) ( P = 0.817; r = 0.551), respectively. The absence of correlation between DMV‐CD105, DMV‐CD34 and tumor grades suggests that anti‐CD105 and anti‐CD34 antibodies have different vascular specificities. MVD‐CD105 was greater in OL grade III than in OL grade II ( P = 0.0032), indicating an increase in the vascular neoformation, something which must be evaluated as a possible prognostic factor in OL. Both TGF‐β and CD105 bring perspectives as “targets” for antiangiogenic treatments in OL.