Premium
Which high‐risk infants should we follow‐up and how should we do it?
Author(s) -
Walker Karen,
Holland Andrew JA,
Halliday Robert,
Badawi Nadia
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of paediatrics and child health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.631
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1440-1754
pISSN - 1034-4810
DOI - 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2012.02540.x
Subject(s) - medicine , neonatal intensive care unit , intervention (counseling) , pediatrics , etiology , multidisciplinary approach , intensive care medicine , psychiatry , social science , sociology
Early detection of neurodevelopmental delay and appropriate intervention has been associated with improved academic and social outcomes. Identifying those who are at high risk and might benefit is not straightforward. Approximately 2% of infants are admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit after birth and these babies are known to be at high risk of developmental impairment. While it is well recognised that the extreme preterm infant is at high risk of developmental impairment, there is increasing evidence of a risk in late preterm infants as well as those undergoing major cardiac and non‐cardiac surgery. Not all infants are enrolled in multidisciplinary follow‐up clinics with easy access to early intervention. These clinics are expensive to run with both limited and conflicting data on their long‐term value. This review will concentrate on identifying which infants are at risk, reviewing the aetiology of the risk factors and the efficacy of follow‐up clinics.