Premium
Basal and residual lower esophageal pressures increase in old age in classic achalasia, but not vigorous achalasia
Author(s) -
Jung Kee Wook,
Jung HwoonYong,
Yoon In Ja,
Kim Do Hoon,
Park HyeWon,
Chung JunWon,
Choi KwiSook,
Kim Kyung Jo,
Choi Kee Don,
Song Ho June,
Lee Gin Hyug,
Kim JinHo
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.214
H-Index - 130
eISSN - 1440-1746
pISSN - 0815-9319
DOI - 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06298.x
Subject(s) - achalasia , medicine , esophageal sphincter , basal (medicine) , esophageal motility disorder , esophagus , gastroenterology , surgery , reflux , disease , insulin
Background and Aim: The relationship between age and esophageal motility parameters (i.e. basal and residual pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter [LES]) remains to be established in achalasia patients, possibly because most previous studies did not distinguish between classic and vigorous achalasia patients. We investigated the relationship between age and esophageal motility parameters in both classic and vigorous achalasia patients. Methods: A retrospective review of esophageal manometry data in a single center was undertaken. Basal and residual pressure for LES was analyzed. A total of 103 achalasia patients were enrolled, comprising 84 classic and 19 vigorous types. They were subdivided into three different age groups as follows: 21–40 years old (group A), 41–60 years old (group B), and over 60 years old (group C). Results: In classic achalasia patients (M : F = 27:57, mean age = 44 ± 15 years old) the older age group showed a significantly higher basal LES pressure (49.62 ± 19.63 mmHg) than the younger age group ( P < 0.0001). Moreover, the older age group also showed significantly high residual LES pressure (20.46 ± 8.61 mmHg) than the younger age group ( P = 0.0006). In contrast, in vigorous achalasia patients (M : F = 12:7, mean age: 47 ± 15 years old) there were no difference between age and motility indices (all P > 0.05). Conclusion: In classic achalasia patients there appears to be a correlation between age and esophageal motility indices, especially basal and residual LES pressure. Such correlations do not appear to exist for vigorous achalasia patients.