z-logo
Premium
Higher cut‐off index value of immunoglobulin M antibody to hepatitis B core antigen in Taiwanese patients with hepatitis B
Author(s) -
Huang YiWen,
Lin ChihLin,
Chen PeiJer,
Lai MingYang,
Kao JiaHorng,
Chen DingShinn
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.214
H-Index - 130
eISSN - 1440-1746
pISSN - 0815-9319
DOI - 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04280.x
Subject(s) - medicine , hepatitis b , antibody , gastroenterology , acute hepatitis b , immunoglobulin m , immunology , hepatitis , immunoglobulin g , hepatitis b virus , hbsag , virus
Background:  The cut‐off index value of immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti‐HBc; AxSYM CORE‐M, Abbott) for diagnosing acute hepatitis B is 1.2. A high false‐positive rate of IgM anti‐HBc was observed in acute flare‐ups of chronic hepatitis B in Taiwanese patients. Thus the purpose of the present paper was to study the optimal index value of IgM anti‐HBc in Taiwanese subjects. Methods:  The peak index values of 42 IgM anti‐HBc‐positive patients were collected. There were 20 acute hepatitis B patients and 22 patients with chronic hepatitis B with acute flare. The biochemical, virological, and serological data were obtained. Results:  There were significant differences in mean age (36 vs 47 years, P  = 0.01), serum alanine aminotransferase level (2042 U/L vs 1193 U/L, P  = 0.02) and peak index value of IgM anti‐HBc (2.9 vs 1.5, P  < 0.01) between patients with acute hepatitis B and those with acute flare of chronic hepatitis B. Eleven (50%) of 22 patients with chronic hepatitis B with acute flare had index value of >1.2. The optimal cut‐off index value to differentiate acute hepatitis B from chronic hepatitis B with acute flare was 2.4–2.5, with a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 90%. Conclusions:  The cut‐off index value of IgM anti‐HBc to differentiate acute hepatitis B from chronic hepatitis B with acute flare among Taiwanese patients should be set at 2.4–2.5 instead of 0.8–1.2.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here