Premium
Antiproliferative effects of 5‐fluorouracil and interferon‐alpha in combination on a hepatocellular carcinoma cell line in vitro and in vivo
Author(s) -
KOJIRO SAKIKO,
YANO HIROHISA,
OGASAWARA SACHIKO,
MOMOSAKI SEIYA,
TAKEMOTO YUMI,
NISHIDA NAOYO,
KOJIRO MASAMICHI
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.214
H-Index - 130
eISSN - 1440-1746
pISSN - 0815-9319
DOI - 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.04154.x
Subject(s) - in vivo , medicine , alpha interferon , in vitro , apoptosis , angiogenesis , hepatocellular carcinoma , interferon alfa , cancer research , cell culture , cyclin e , cell growth , interferon , cyclin d1 , pathology , immunology , cell cycle , biology , cancer , biochemistry , genetics , microbiology and biotechnology
Abstract Background and Aim: We investigated the antiproliferative effects of interferon‐alpha (IFN‐α) and 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) in combination on a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell line. Method: In the in vitro study, IFN‐α and/or 5‐FU was added to the culture of the poorly differentiated‐type HCC cell line, HAK‐1B, and their antiproliferative effects and additional or synergic effects in combination treatment were examined. In the in vivo study, HAK‐1B cells were transplanted into nude mice and the changes in tumor volume and weight, apoptosis, BrdU and cyclin A positive cells, and artery‐like blood vessels were investigated. Expressions of angiogenesis factors and IFN‐α receptor (IFNAR‐2) were examined in the developed tumors. Results: In vitro growth of HAK‐1B cells was suppressed dose‐dependently to 5‐FU, but the addition of IFN‐α did not induce additional or synergic effects. In vivo growth in terms of tumor diameter and weight was suppressed at most in the IFN‐α + 5‐FU (combination) group, that is, the tumor volume became 29.3% and the tumor weight became 54.7% of the control. In the combination group, numbers of BrdU‐positive S‐phase cells and cyclin A positive cells increased together with the increase in apoptotic cells, but there was no significant relation between the tumor shrinkage effects and angiogenesis factors or artery‐like blood vessels. In the combination group, INFAR‐2 decreased significantly in comparison to the other groups. Conclusion: The synergic growth‐suppression effects in the current in vivo study using the combination treatment are attributable to the enhanced induction of S‐phase arrest and of apoptosis.