Premium
Similarities between strike‐slip faults at different scales and a simple age determining method for active faults
Author(s) -
Kim YoungSeog,
Sanderson David J.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
island arc
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.554
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1440-1738
pISSN - 1038-4871
DOI - 10.1111/j.1440-1738.2003.00410.x
Subject(s) - geology , seismology , strike slip tectonics , slip (aerodynamics) , active fault , seismic gap , tectonics , fault (geology) , elastic rebound theory , geodesy , engineering , aerospace engineering
Several differently scaled strike‐slip faults were examined. The faults shared many geometric features, such as secondary fractures and linkage structures (damage zones). Differences in fault style were not related to specific scale ranges. However, it was recognized that differences in style may occur in different tectonic settings (e.g. dilational/contractional relays or wall/linkage/tip zones), different locations along the master fault or different fault evolution stages. Fractal dimensions were compared for two faults (Gozo and San Andreas), which supports the idea of self‐similarity. Fractal dimensions for traces of faults and fractures of damage zones were higher ( D ∼1.35) than for the main fault traces ( D ∼1.005) because of increased complexity due to secondary faults and fractures. Based on the statistical analysis of another fault evolution study, single event movements in earthquake faults typically have a maximum earthquake slip : rupture length ratio of approximately 10 −4 , although this has only been established for large earthquake faults because of limited data. Most geological faults have a much higher maximum cumulative displacement : fault length ratio; that is, approximately 10 −2 to 10 −1 (e.g. Gozo, ∼10 −2 ; San Andreas, ∼10 −1 ). The final cumulative displacement on a fault is produced by accumulation of slip along ruptures. Hence, using the available information from earthquake faults, such as earthquake slip, recurrence interval, maximum cumulative displacement and fault length, the approximate age of active faults can be estimated. The lower limit of estimated active fault age is expressed with maximum cumulative displacement, earthquake slip and recurrence interval as T ≅ (d max /u) · I(M) .