Premium
Geology of the southern Zambales Ophiolite Complex, Luzon, Philippines
Author(s) -
Yumul Graciano P.,
Dimalanta Carla B.,
Jumawan Ferdinand T.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
island arc
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.554
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1440-1738
pISSN - 1038-4871
DOI - 10.1111/j.1440-1738.2000.00300.x
Subject(s) - massif , geology , ophiolite , geochemistry , basalt , fault (geology) , terrane , bay , seismology , volcanic arc , island arc , subduction , oceanography , tectonics
Field, geochemical and geophysical evidence show that the southern Zambales Ophiolite Complex attained its present‐day configuration through the juxtapositioning of an arc terrane (San Antonio massif) to a back‐arc crust (Cabangan massif). The San Antonio massif manifests island arc‐related characteristics (i.e. spinel XCr [Cr/(Cr + Al)] >0.60; mostly plagioclase An92–95; pyroxene crystallizing ahead of plagioclase; orthopyroxene as an early, major crystallizing phase) which cannot be directly parental to the Cabangan massif transitional mid‐ocean ridge basalt to island arc tholeiitic volcanic carapace. The two massifs are believed to be separated by a left‐lateral strike–slip fault, the Subic Bay Fault Zone. Apart from the presence of highly sheared, allochthonous outcrops, the Subic Bay Fault Zone is generally defined by northwest–southeast trending magnetic and bouguer anomalies. The San Antonio massif was translated southward from the northern part of the Zambales Ophiolite Complex through the Subic Bay Fault Zone. This resulted into its suturing with the Cabangan massif and could have led to the formation of the present‐day Subic Bay.