z-logo
Premium
POSSIBLE INVOLVEMENT OF MUSCARINIC M 1 AND M 3 RECEPTOR SUBTYPES MEDIATING VASODILATION IN ISOLATED, PERFUSED CANINE LINGUAL ARTERIES
Author(s) -
Chiba Shigetoshi,
Tsukada Miyoko
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
clinical and experimental pharmacology and physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 103
eISSN - 1440-1681
pISSN - 0305-1870
DOI - 10.1111/j.1440-1681.1996.tb01189.x
Subject(s) - pirenzepine , muscarinic acetylcholine receptor , vasodilation , acetylcholine , antagonist , phenylephrine , endocrinology , chemistry , medicine , muscarinic acetylcholine receptor m3 , endothelium , pharmacology , receptor , blood pressure
SUMMARY 1. Using the cannula insertion method, muscarinic receptor subtypes were analysed in isolated, perfused canine lingual arteries preconstricted with phenylephrine. 2. Both acetylcholine and McN‐A‐343 induced a profound vasodilation in a dose‐related manner. Acetylcholine‐induced dilations were approximately 1000‐times more potent than McN‐A‐343‐induced dilation. 3. Acetylcholine‐induced dilations were abolished after removal of the endothelium by intraluminal treatment with 1 mg saponin. 4. Acetylcholine‐induced dilations were markedly inhibited by an M 1 /M 3 receptor antagonist, 4‐DAMP. Moreover, they were slightly, but significantly, inhibited by an M 1 antagonist, pirenzepine, but never influenced by an M 2 antagonist, AF‐DX 116. Mc‐N‐A‐343‐induced vasodilations were inhibited by both 4‐DAMP or pirenzepine. 5. These results suggest that there are abundant functional M 3 and a few M 1 receptors in the canine lingual artery that mediate vasodilation and that this vasodilation is dependent on the presence of an intact endothelium.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here