Premium
From rural beginnings to statewide roll‐out: Evaluation of facilitator training for a group‐based diabetes prevention program
Author(s) -
Vaughan Clare,
Reddy Prasuna,
Dunbar James
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
australian journal of rural health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.48
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1440-1584
pISSN - 1038-5282
DOI - 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2010.01126.x
Subject(s) - facilitator , facilitation , medicine , confidence interval , program evaluation , psychology , physical therapy , social psychology , public administration , neuroscience , political science
Objective: To evaluate the approach used to train facilitators for a large‐scale group‐based diabetes prevention program developed from a rural implementation research project.Participants: Orientation day was attended by 224 health professionals; 188 submitted the self‐learning task; 175 achieved the satisfactory standard for the self‐learning task and attended the workshop; 156 completed the pre‐ and post‐training questionnaires.Main outcome measures: Two pre‐ and post‐training scales were developed to assess knowledge and confidence in group‐based diabetes prevention program facilitation. Principal component analysis found four factors for measuring training effectiveness: knowledge of diabetes prevention, knowledge of group facilitation, confidence to facilitate a group to improve health literacy and confidence in diabetes prevention program facilitation. Self‐learning task scores, training discontinuation rates and satisfaction scores were also assessed.Results: There was significant improvement in all four knowledge and confidence factors from pre‐ to post‐training ( P < 0.001). The self‐learning task mean test score was 88.7/100 (SD = 7.7), and mean assignment score was 72.8/100 (SD = 16.1). Satisfaction with training scores were positive and ‘previous training’ interacted with ‘change in knowledge of diabetes prevention program facilitation’ but not with change in ‘confidence to facilitate.’ Conclusions: The training program was effective when analysed by change in facilitator knowledge and confidence and the positive mean satisfaction score. Learning task scores suggest tasks were manageable and the requirement contributed to facilitator self‐selection. Improvement in confidence scores in facilitating a group‐based diabetes prevention program, irrespective of previous training and experience, show that program‐specific skill development activities are necessary in curriculum design.