z-logo
Premium
Do the learning needs of rural and urban general practitioners differ?
Author(s) -
Allan James A.,
Schaefer Di
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
australian journal of rural health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.48
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1440-1584
pISSN - 1038-5282
DOI - 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2005.00734.x
Subject(s) - general practice , medicine , global positioning system , population , work (physics) , rural area , family medicine , rural health , medical education , nursing , environmental health , mechanical engineering , telecommunications , pathology , computer science , engineering
  The challenges of rural general practice have given rise to a separate rural training stream and a separate rural professional body. The differences are characterised by the nature of the work undertaken by rural GPs and reflected in the continuing medical education topic choices made when surveyed.Methods:  In 2001 a survey was designed and distributed by the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and Divisions of General Practice in South Australia and Northern Territory. The survey utilised a list of 104 topics. The topic choices of rural and urban GPs were compared.Results:  The survey was distributed to approximately 1762 GPs and yielded 578 responses (33%). Rural GPs were more likely to select the following topics: Anaesthetics, Aboriginal Torres Strait Islander health, Population Health, Renal medicine, Cardiology, Teaching skills, Obstetrics, Neonates, Arrhythmias, Fracture management, Tropical medicine and Therapeutics. Urban GPs were more likely to select Menopause, Travel medicine and Palliative care ( P <  0.05). Discussion:  Many of the areas of difference reflected aspects of rural general practice. There were also many similarities in topic choices between these two groups.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here