z-logo
Premium
Interspecific hybridization in wild Cicer sp.
Author(s) -
Abbo S.,
Mesghenna Y. T.,
Van Oss H.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
plant breeding
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.583
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1439-0523
pISSN - 0179-9541
DOI - 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2010.01838.x
Subject(s) - biology , perennial plant , interspecific competition , backcrossing , pollen , interspecific hybridization , botany , fertility , chromosome pairing , sterility , agronomy , meiosis , hybrid , population , genetics , demography , sociology , gene
With 2 figures and 5 tablesAbstract Interspecific hybridization between closely related wild Cicer species was performed. The Cicer judaicum  ×  C. pinnatifidum cross resulted in sterile F 1 ’s because of abnormal flowers. Backcrossing the F 1 plant with C. pinnatifidum pollen resulted in mostly sterile BC 1 F 1 plants. Similarly, poor fertility was observed among the C. bijugum × C. judaicum F 2 . The annual C. cuneatum  × perennial C. canariense F 1 ’s was partially fertile with intermediate morphology. Meiotic chromosome pairing in the annual × perennial F 1 ’s was mostly normal, but pollen fertility was approximately 50%. These plants flowered profusely but produced only a meagre yield of viable F 2 seeds and many shrivelled seeds. Similar to the situation in other interspecific crosses, the fertility and vigour of the F 2 plants derived from the annual × perennial cross were lower compared with that of the F 1 , yet another demonstration of the complex crossing barriers prevalent in the genus Cicer . The implications of the above findings to chickpea breeding are discussed with emphasis on the actual value of distantly related wild relatives for chickpea improvement.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here