z-logo
Premium
Progressive Differentiation of Spikelet Types in Relation to Ploidy in the Genus Avena
Author(s) -
Nishiyama I.
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
plant breeding
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.583
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1439-0523
pISSN - 0179-9541
DOI - 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1987.tb01158.x
Subject(s) - synapsis , biology , ploidy , meiosis , genetics , chromosome pairing , chromosome , genome , avena , gene , hybrid , loss of heterozygosity , botany , allele
In the study of interspecific and interploidy hybrids of Avena the order of spikelet types in the recessive < dominance sequence was found to be as follows: N 1 (naked type) < C 1,2 (cultivated, type) < W 1,2 (wild type) < S 1,2 (subwild type) < W 3 < S 3 < C 3 < N (1)3 , where superscripts 1, 2 and 3 indicate the spikelet type of diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid species, respectively. Nullisomic studies of hexaploid species showed that chromosome MK‐9 of the 3rd genome controlled multiple alleles W 3 , S 3 and C 3 types, except N (1)3 type, and synapsis of meiotic chromosomes. Its homoeologous chromosomes of the 1st and 2nd genomes appeared to affect the W type (probably introduction of W 1 and W 2 ) as well as meiotic asynapsis. The asynapsis might be induced by deficiency of a synapsis‐gene(s) in a primary hexaploid form or species. The N (1)3 type probably occurred by dominant or epistatic mutation of the W 1 type in A. sativa , and the C 3 type hidden was present. The maintenance of such a heterozygosity system may be mainly due to diploid‐like pairing of chromosomes on the balance between the synaptic and asynaptic gene functions.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here